I spent 3 days, then 5 hours in Urgent Care, before getting the diagnosis: joint arthritis. Arthritis at 32?! was all I kept thinking. The doc told me that arthritis can hit at any age and all it technically means is joint inflammation. I relaxed a bit and made the soonest appointment I could for the treatment: a cortisone shot into my ankle on Wednesday, 6 days away. In a small town there aren't many options so I committed to this plan and we headed back to my cabin to settle in for the long week of doing absolutely nothing.
WebMD is not your friend. I was convinced I had every ankle affliction I researched, sure they would have to amputate. The diagnosis of arthritis hadn't even been on my radar so I was skeptical. I had never felt such an intense pain and I was sure that I had fractured my ankle. Before heading out on this trip I did a lot of research on overuse injuries and stress fractures are one of the most common ailments that take hikers off of the trail. Unfortunately with overuse injuries you can't really prevent them you can only deal with them as best you can, or stop your hike. In the case of a stress fracture it can take months to recover and it would surely end the hike. Furthermore with stress fractures they don't show up initially on an xray, and only can be diagnosed once they start to heal and show up. So I was confused and concerned, and with 6 days til my shot I had plenty of time to fall into the depths of my inactive brain and contemplate every possible scenario that could potentially play out.
Before setting out on this hike I was very vague about my expectations, intentions and plans mainly because I wasn't too sure of them myself. In loose summary, my main goal was to be inspired, accomplish something big and see something difficult through to completion. Beyond these basic goals I was hoping to let the trip play out like most of my long-term trips, with a beautifully serendipitous, unpredictable course.
Then I started hiking. Like most hikers I pushed too hard the first day, mainly trying to keep up with the folks around me. I immediately got a lot of blisters and realised I had overdone it. I felt like I had gotten my ass kicked and I could barely walk, but I had been able to keep up with the pack. Was this winning? Was this the goal? Was it worth it?
Over the next few weeks I watched as some grew faster, some fell behind me in pace and others (like me) took frequent breaks for blisters and other injuries. This year, more than any other year, there's this defense hikers seem to be armed with; the movie WILD seemed to trigger a lot of doubts in this year's class of hikers and since day one we've been battling the stereotype of 'careless, unprepared and unfit hiker.' There's also the need to prove yourself to other hikers. No, there shouldn't be a need, but like with any sport you want to show you belong on the field. Perhaps more so with me as I don't look the part of the svelt hiker, the need to show my physical fitness has pushed me harder than ever.
There's a very basic (maybe even Freudian?) view of success out here: Faster days with bigger miles, quicker climbs, etc. are all looked at as signs of success. And I'm guilty of this as well, as proven by how many people I told about my first 26 mile day- a day that might have triggered this injury- with a proud smile and boastful demeanor. It felt good to accomplish something physically tough. But the morning after this accomplishment was the first time I distinctly remember my ankle having a dull pain. So I had achieved success in one sense but failed in another.. The lines between the two were beginning to blur. And there was another aspect to it all.. This is a 2,650 mile journey and the sacrifices you make for achieving success one day (by oh say pushing 26 miles) could be an immediate success that ruins your joint/foot health and chance of completing the rest of the trail. The risks and pain you might allow during a marathon are absurd to allow when you are going to be doing back-to-back marathons for almost 6 months!
There are several options concerning continuing on that have been bouncing around in my mind. It is still pretty early in the season and I would still be able to complete a thru hike of the trail if I start back within a couple days. Another option is to skip ahead by a couple hundred miles and start closer to the Sierras. And another option still, would be to continue on at my slow pace from here and if it looks like I am running out of time towards the end I can flip-flop the hike by flying to Canada and hiking southbound to avoid the snow. My reasons for all the different plans include a number of uncertainties. I'm still not sure whether or not this shot will work, or how long it will work. Even if the shot works, the mileage I am used to will likely not be possible for a while and I will be hiking very slow at first. After this injury I am also unsure of the future of my long distance hiking career... Who knows how long I will be able to keep hiking and if I only can hike another 500 miles this trip don't I want those to be the prettiest 500 miles of the trail? This has been a constant struggle with my pride, sensibilities and ego that I've had to confront. And this is just in my mind... you better believe every hiker on the trail has an opinion on things...
I've explained before about how different people define their hike in different ways. The loose definition of a thru-hike is one end-to-end hike of a trail within one season. Purist hikers tend to insist on hiking every step of the actual trail whereas others are content with common sense detours and side trails so long as a continuous foot-path is taken between the start and end of the trail. Well, here's my thought: I missed about 1.75 miles at Idyllwild of walkable road (walkable yet dangerous and ill-advised by locals), so technically I'm not going to be 100% able to hike every mile. And now, per my hiker doctor's instruction, I'm going to miss another couple miles since it would be detrimental to my healing ankle to summit Mt. Baden-Powell (a steep 4 mile ascent that would over-extend my ankle). So that's another 6 missed miles. So in some people's minds I'm already not a true thru-hiker. But honestly, I couldn't give a shit less! I will hike 99.9% of available miles, and then another hundred between side trips and town walking. I refuse to miss the most beautiful waterfall near the trail simply because it's not on the exact route, nor will I succumb to blinding pride and do something detrimental to my health like trying to ignore and push through pain. So at the end of the day I will still call myself a thru-hiker even though I will have technically skipped 15 or so PCT miles. HYOH means Hike Your Own Hike. Do what you're comfortable with and hike your hike to your own specifications.
So aside from mine, who else's opinion of my hike matters? My parents. Regardless of how far I go after this I know they are already proud of me, but I want them to see me finish this as far as I can. We're on the same page that health is more important than this hike but so long as I can be out here, I'm going to be.
So who's opinion doesn't count? Everyone else's! I had a friend who was overwhelmingly negative about my attempt at this hike and actually said (a few beers in) "Even my friend Sarah couldn't do it, and she's a badass." I was floored at the implications of that and several other things he said and at first they motivated me, and now I just realise that his opinions don't matter, and they were likely made from a place of envy and bitterness. Every other person I talked to about the trip had great things to say and wished me well. I've thought a lot about what this hike will mean to individual people in my life, and I've thought about my reputation based on this hike, and I've had to deal with letting go of thoughts on that. I can't worry or care what other people think, it's me and what I think that matters.
And what if I have to stop hiking this season? Well, I would be pretty bummed, but after a week of pondering it the shock of the finality of that fate has worn off and I'm coming to grips with it, if it were to come to that. It might happen, this injury has shown me how quickly and unpredictably my luck and health can change. No hike in the world is worth risking my future health on and if hiking at this rate is going to cause permanent damage to my joints then I'll stop. I've hiked 370 miles, and at this point I am a "section hiker" and the PCT will always be something I plug away at until I finish, even if it's not a one-season push. I think for a lot of people this is the one or first big adventure of their lives which would make not finishing a bigger deal. To me, this is amazing, but it's just one more trip in a very long line of bucket list-worthy adventures I've been fortunate enough to go on. The proof is in my ankle- this injury is the culmination of stomping my way around the world and doing masive amounts of exploring by foot, dancing, and chasing dreams my whole life. If I had to stop it would only be a matter of months before I embark on another journey.
So who knows what this injury will do to my hike! I start back this weekend at small miles and I will continue as long as I can. It has already been an amazing adventure full of more beauty and incredible people than I could have imagined. Lets hope I can keep going and make it to Canada but there's no rush... as they say, "Last one to Canada wins!"
Sitting and waiting to hit the road again, finally smiling and optimistic!